Name of the Republic of Moldova

RESOLUTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

of January 24, 2017 No. 2

About interpretation of provisions of Art. 98 of the h. (6) Constitutions of the Republic of Moldova (the joint decision in case of staff movements in the Government) (the address No. 5b/2017)

Constitutional court in structure:

To Alexander Tenase, chairman,

Auryl to Beesh,

Igor Dolya,

Tudor Pantsyru,

Victor of Pop,

Vyacheslav Zaporozhan, judges,

with the assistance of the secretary of meeting Lyudmila Kikhay,

in view of the address provided and registered on January 10, 2017

having considered the specified address in open plenary meeting,

considering acts and case papers,

having carried out discussion in the consultative room,

issues the following decree:

Points of order

1. The address brought into the Constitutional court on January 10, 2017 by deputies of Parliament formed the basis for consideration of the case: Mihai Ghimpu, Ion Apostol, Valerian Bezhan, Roman Botsan, Liliyan Karp, Ion Kasyan, Petra Kosoy, Yuriye Dyrd, Oleg Ogor, Stefan Wlas, Alina Zotya according to provisions of Art. 135 of the h. (1) item b) Constitutions, Art. 25 of the item g) Law on the Constitutional court and Art. 38 of the h. (1) the item g) the Code of the constitutional jurisdiction, about interpretation of Art. 98 of the h. (4) and h. (6) Constitutions of the Republic of Moldova.

2. Authors of the address require to give interpretation of Art. 98 of the h. (4) and h. (6) and to explain to the Constitution the next moments:

"1. Whether the President of the Republic of Moldova has rights to the nominal veto in case of appointment of structure of the Government which received vote of confidence from Parliament or in case of appointment of certain members of the government according to the proposal of the Prime Minister in case of updating of the Government?

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info