RESOLUTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

of July 9, 2020 No. 20

About interpretation of provisions of Art. 134 of h (1) and h (2), Art. 136 of h (3) and Art. 140 of h (2) Constitutions (addresses No. 100b/2020, No. 102b/2020 and No. 103b/2020)

Name of the Republic of Moldova

Constitutional court in structure:

Domnika Manole, chairman,

Eduard Ababey,

Nicolae Roshka,

Liouba Shova,

Vladimir Tsurkan, judges,

with the assistance of the assistant judge Dumitra Avornik,

in view of addresses,

registered 23, on June 25 and 30, 2020,

having considered the specified addresses in the consultative room,

considering acts and case papers,

having carried out discussion in the consultative room,

issues the following decree.

Points of order

1. The addresses brought into the Constitutional court 23, on June 25 and 30, 2020 by deputies of Parliament of the Republic of Moldova to Serdzhiu Litvinenko (the address No. 100b/2020 of), Dean Plyngeu (the address No. 102b/2020 of) both Denis Ulanov and Sergey Syrbu (the address No. 103b/2020 of) according to Art. 135 of h (1) the item b) formed the basis for consideration of the case to the Constitution, Art. 25 of the item g) the Law on the Constitutional court and Art. 38 of h (1) the item g) the Code of the constitutional jurisdiction.

2. The author of the address No. 100b/2020 asks to explain the Constitutional court:

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info