LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF BELARUS

of July 17, 2020 No. 45-Z

About change of codes

Accepted by the House of Representatives on June 25, 2020

Approved by Council of the Republic on June 30, 2020

Article 1. Bring in the Economic Procedure Code of the Republic of Belarus of December 15, 1998 the following changes:

1. To add Article 1 after the paragraph of the fifth with the paragraph of the following content:

"the brief protocol, the protocol - court documents in which with observance of the procedure established by this Code are fixed the production fact on economic case, content and results of legal proceedings;".

2. The fourth to state the paragraph to part one of Article 33 in the following edition:

"provides use of means zvuko-or videos for fixation of the course of judicial session or making of separate legal proceeding of court out of meeting and creation of the brief protocol, protocol;".

3. To state the paragraph of the sixth part two of Article 70 in the following edition:

"get acquainted with zvuko-or video, with the brief protocol, the protocol of judicial session in which he participated and to do subjects to entering into the brief protocol, the protocol of the note concerning completeness and correctness of record of its actions and the expert opinion;".

4. The sixth Article 72 to state part in the following edition:

"For making obviously false evidences, the witness bears the responsibility established by the Criminal code of the Republic of Belarus for refusal or evasion of evidence.".

5. In Article 74:

the fourth after words "the signature in" to add part with words "brief protocol";

the fifth to state part in the following edition:

"The translator has the right to ask questions to the participants of economic process who are present at transfer for the purpose of refining of sense of the translated words and expressions, to get acquainted with zvuko-or video, with the brief protocol, the protocol of judicial session or making of separate legal proceeding of court out of meeting in which he participated and to do the notes which are subject to entering in the brief protocol, the protocol.";

the seventh to state part in the following edition:

"For obviously incorrect translation, without valid excuse from execution of the obligations assigned to it the translator bears the responsibility established by the Criminal code of the Republic of Belarus for refusal or evasion.".

6. In Article 75:

the second to state part in the following edition:

"The witness has the right:

do concerning legal proceeding in which he participated the statements and notes which are subject to entering in the protocol in case it is constituted;

get acquainted with zvuko-or video, with the brief protocol, the protocol of making of separate legal proceeding of court out of meeting in which it participated and to require entering into the brief protocol, protocol of corrections and amendments.";

third parts three after words "the signature in" to add the paragraph with words "brief protocol".

7. In Article 81 part four the word "protocol" shall be replaced with words "the brief protocol, the protocol of judicial session".

8. Third of Article 91 after the words "record in" to add part with words "brief protocol".

9. The ninth Articles 94, part the fifth Article 96-1 and part the sixth Article 99 to add part with the words "in case it is constituted".

10. In part five of Article 96-2 of the word "the protocol of judicial session" shall be replaced with words "case when the protocol of judicial session is constituted,".

11. The fourth to state the paragraph to part three of Article 97 in the following edition:

"warns the witness about criminal liability for making obviously false evidences, for refusal or evasion from evidence.".

12. The fourth Articles 107, part one of Article 180 and part the second Article 181 after the words "are brought in" to add part with the words "brief protocol".

13. Exclude Article 110.

14. The fifth Article 114 to state part in the following edition:

"Also the document confirming payment of the state fee is attached to petitions for providing the claim considered by the international Arbitration (arbitration) Court, reference tribunal, except for case when the state fee is paid by means of use of the automated information system of single settlement and information space (further - the ERIP system) and the accounting transaction number (transactions) in single settlement and information space is specified in the petition or reported to the court considering economic cases, otherwise in case of submission of the petition.".

15. In Article 127:

third to state part in the following edition:

"The document confirming payment of the state fee is enclosed to the application for increase in the size of claims, except for case when the state fee is paid by means of use of the ERIP system and the accounting transaction number (transactions) in single settlement and information space is specified in the statement or reported to the court considering economic cases, otherwise in case of filing of application.";

the fourth to exclude part.

16. The sixteenth Article 151 to state the paragraph in the following edition:

"in case of not achievement of conciliation by the parties in the conciliatory procedure by the claimant does not submit the document confirming surcharge of the state fee in the amount of, established by legal acts, or the accounting transaction number (transactions) in single settlement and information space is not specified in the statement in case the state fee is paid in addition by means of use of the ERIP system, or such accounting number is not reported to the court considering economic cases, otherwise in case of filing of application;".

17. To state paragraph two of part one of Article 160 in the following edition:

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info