DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL CHAMBER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE KYRGYZ REPUBLIC

of February 17, 2021

On the case of check of constitutionality of normative provision of part 3 of Article 430 of the Code of penal procedure of the Kyrgyz Republic put into words "the judgments of appellate instance passed according to claims to resolutions of the investigative judge are not subject to revision in cassation procedure", in connection with Vakhitov Valeryan's address of Akhmetovich representing Amatov Tursunbek Osekovich's interests.

The constitutional chamber of the Supreme Court of the Kyrgyz Republic in structure:

the chairman - Duysheev K. A., judges Bobukeeva M. R., Zhumabayev L. P., Kasymaliyeva M. Sh., Kydyrbayev К.Дж., Oskonbayeva E. Zh., Saalayeva Zh. I., Sharshenaliyeva Zh. A., in case of the secretary Ablakimov K. A.,

with participation:

the defendant party - Orozobek Maksat's uula, the representative of Jogorku Kenesh of the Kyrgyz Republic by proxy;

other persons - Childebayev Tashtemir Abazovich, the representative of the Office of the President of the Kyrgyz Republic by proxy, Abdyrayev Bakyt, the representative of the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic by proxy, Iskakov Erkin Bakburovich, the representative of the Supreme Court of the Kyrgyz Republic by proxy, Alchiyev Rysbek Karagulovich, the representative of the Prosecutor General's Office of the Kyrgyz Republic by proxy,

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info