DECISION OF ECONOMIC COURT OF COMMONWEALTH OF INDEPENDENT STATES

of February 28, 1996 No. 13/95/C-1/6-96

Economic Court of the Commonwealth of Independent States in structure:

the chairman - the Chairman of Economic Court Dashuk L. A.,

judges of Economic Court Abdrakhmanov S. S., Begaliyev M. A., Bekenova R. A., Vylkova I. K., Kerimbayeva A. Sh., Makhmudova L. Sh., Miroshnik V. I., Simonyana G. V., Tolibova X.,

in case of Madudina T. I. secretary.,

with participation:

General adviser of Economic Court of Zatsepiny T.N., representative of the Executive Secretariat of the Commonwealth of Independent States Korablev V. A.,

having considered case on request of the Executive Secretariat of the Commonwealth of Independent States on interpretation in proceeding in open court,

established:

The executive Secretariat of the Commonwealth of Independent States in the request asks Economic Court to give interpretation about scope of the Agreement on procedure for provision of pensions of the military personnel and their families and national insurance of the military personnel of the State Parties of the Commonwealth of Independent States of May 15, 1992: whether it extends to allowance payment to members of families of the died military personnel and military pensioners. Number of the documents testimonial of ambiguous understanding by subjects of execution of provisions of the specified Agreement is given to reasons for request.

Having heard the judge-speaker Vylkov I. K., representative of the Executive Secretariat of the Commonwealth Korablev V. A., having analyzed the conclusion of the General adviser of Economic Court of Zatsepiny T.N., having studied the documents which are available in case, the Economic Court came to the following conclusions.

According to the Vienna convention on the right of international treaties of 1969, the agreement shall be interpreted honesty according to regular value which should be given to terms of the agreement in their context, and also in the light of object and agreements are more whole; at the same time for the purposes of interpretation of the agreement the context covers any agreement relating to the agreement which was reached between all participants in connection with the conclusion of the agreement (Article 31).

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info