Decision of Economic Court of the Commonwealth of Independent States

of September 28, 1999 No. 01-1/3-99

Economic Court of the Commonwealth of Independent States in structure:

the chairman - the Acting Chairman of Economic Court Apostle D.D.,

judges of Economic Court of Kerimbayeva A. Sh., Makhmudova L. Sh., Miroshnik V. I., Sarsenbayeva A. O., Simonyana G. V.,

in case of the court clerk Medvedeva T. E.,

with participation of the General adviser of Pronina M. G.,

representatives of the applicant Pashukov A. A., Podgaysky E. N.,

having considered in proceeding in open court case at the request of the State committee on aircraft of the Republic of Belarus on interpretation, established:

The state committee on aircraft of the Republic of Belarus at the request of Council of Ministers of the Republic of Belarus (The resolution of Council of Ministers of the Republic of Belarus of April 7, 1999 N 475) appealed to Economic Court of the Commonwealth of Independent States with request about interpretation of Item 1 of article 3 of the Agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation and the Government of the Republic of Belarus about cooperative principles and conditions of relations in the field of transport of July 20, 1992. The State Committee on aircraft of the Republic of Belarus, in particular, asks to explain whether provisions of Item 1 of article 3 of the Agreement between the Government of the Russian Federation and the Government of the Republic of Belarus expatiate on cooperative principles and conditions of relations in the field of transport of July 20, 1992 on charges for aeronautical servicing. The request about interpretation as specifies the State committee on aircraft of the Republic of Belarus, is dictated by lack of regulation of dispute on payment of aeronautical charges from 1993 for 1997 between airlines of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus.

Having heard the judge-speaker Makhmudova L. Sh., representatives of the State committee on aircraft of the Republic of Belarus Podgaysky E. N. and Pashukova A. A., having discussed the conclusion of the General adviser of Economic Court Pronina M. G., having researched the documents which are available in case, the Economic Court came to the following conclusions.

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info