CONCLUSION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

of April 25, 2006 No. 1

Under the bill on offer exception "Legality got is meant" from part (3) article 46 of the Constitution of the Republic of Moldova

Name of the Republic of Moldova,

Constitutional court in structure:

Victor PUSKAS is chairman

Alina YANUCHENKO is judge

Mircha of the SOUTH - the judge

To Dumitr PULBERE - the judge-speaker

Elena SAFALERU is judge

Ion VASILATI is judge with the assistance of Victoria Botnaryuk, the secretary of meeting, Ion Mytsu, the permanent representative of Parliament in the Constitutional court, Nicolae Eshana, the permanent representative of the Government in the Constitutional court, according to Art. 135 of the h. (1) item c) and Art. 141 of the h. (1) item b) and item c) Constitutions, Art. 4 of the h. (1) item c) Law on the Constitutional court, Art. 4 of the h. (1) item c) and Art. 16 of the h. (1) the Code of the constitutional jurisdiction considered in open plenary meeting the appeal of the Government about making the conclusion under the bill on modification of the h. (3) Art. 46 of the Constitution of the Republic of Moldova.

Determination of February 10, 2006 the Constitutional court accepted the appeal to consideration on the merits.

During preliminary consideration of the address the Constitutional court requested the points of view of Parliament, the President of the Republic of Moldova, the Government, the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Prosecutor General's Office, the Highest trial chamber, the Center for human rights, the Helsinki Human Rights Committee in the Republic of Moldova, Institute of criminal reforms, department of the criminal law and criminalistics of the State university of Moldova, the International independent university of Moldova, Council of Bar of the Republic of Moldova and the Venetian commission of the Council of Europe.

The constitutional court allocated with competence to express according to offers on review of the Constitution, having considered the address and the bill provided by the Government, having heard the message of the judge-speaker and arguments of representatives of Parliament and Government, established:

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info