RESOLUTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

of February 28, 2006 No. 5

About control of constitutionality of Art. 3 of the p. 13 and Art. 68 of the h. (10) - (13) the Law No. 199-XIV of November 18, 1998 "About the security market"

Name of the Republic of Moldova

Constitutional court in structure:

Victor PUSKAS is chairman

Alina YANUCHENKO is judge

Mircha of the SOUTH - the judge - the speaker

To Dumitr PULBERE - the judge

Elena SAFALERU is judge

Ion VASILATI is the judge with participation Botnaryuk Victoria, the secretary of meeting, the deputy of Parliament George Susarenko, the author of the address, Ion Mytsu, the permanent representative of Parliament in the Constitutional court, Nadezhda Stanchu, the representative of Parliament, the member of the National commission on securities, being guided by Art. 135 of the h. (1) item and) Constitutions, Art. 4 of the h. (1) item and) Law on the Constitutional court, Art. 4 of the h. (1) item and) and Art. 16 of the h. (1) the Code of the constitutional jurisdiction, considered case on control of constitutionality of Art. 3 of the p. 13 and Art. 68 of the h in open plenary meeting. (10) - (13) the Law N199-XIV of November 18, 1998 "About the security market".

The address of the deputy of Parliament George Susarenko provided on December 13, 2005 according to provisions of Art. 24 and Art. 25 of the Law on the Constitutional court, Art. 38 and Art. 39 of the Code of the constitutional jurisdiction formed the basis for consideration of the case.

The address was accepted determination of the Constitutional court of December 22, 2005 to consideration on the merits.

During preliminary consideration of the address the points of view of Parliament, the President of the Republic of Moldova, the Government, the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Economy and Trade, the Prosecutor General's Office, the National commission on securities, Academies of Sciences, the State university of Moldova were requested.

Having considered case papers, having heard the message of the judge-speaker and explanation of participants of meeting, the Constitutional court at with t and N about in and l:

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info