RESOLUTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLODOV

of January 13, 2006 No. 1

About approval of the Report on implementation of the constitutional jurisdiction in 2005

Name of the Republic of Moldova

Constitutional court in structure:

Victor PUSKAS is chairman, the judge-speaker

Alina YANUCHENKO is judge

Mircha of the SOUTH - the judge

To Dumitr PULBERE - the judge

Elena SAFALERU is judge

Ion VASILATI is judge with the assistance of Galina Pankratova, the secretary of meeting, the head of the Secretariat Victor Russu, based on Art. 10 and Art. 23 of the h. (2) the Law on the Constitutional court, Art. 5 of the item i) and Art. 80 of the Code of the constitutional jurisdiction the Report on implementation of the constitutional jurisdiction in 2005 considered in plenary meeting.

Being guided by provisions of Art. 26 of the Law on the Constitutional court, Art. 61 of the h. (1) and Art. 62 of the item f) the Code of the constitutional jurisdiction, the Constitutional court DECIDES:

1. Approve the Report on implementation of the constitutional jurisdiction in 2005 with appendices which are report component.

2. Send the report to Parliament, the President of the Republic of Moldova, the Government and the Supreme council of magistracy.

3. This resolution is final and together with the report is published in "Monitorul Oficial al Republicii Moldova".

Approved by the Resolution of the Constitutional court of January 13, 2006, No. 1

The report on implementation of the constitutional jurisdiction in 2005

I. STATISTICAL DATA OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL JURISDICTION IN 2005

Last year 32 addresses with request about control of constitutionality of regulations (15 laws, 4 orders of the Government and one resolution of Parliament), one address - about giving interpretation of the Constitution, 2 addresses - about review of the Constitution were brought into the Constitutional court. Also 2 addresses from 27 provided in 2004 are considered.

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info