RESOLUTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COUNCIL OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

of March 6, 1997 No. 3

About official interpretation of Item 1 of Article 4, Item 1 of Article 14, subitem 3) Item 3 of Article 77, Item 1 of Article 79 and Item 1 of article 83 of the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan

The constitutional Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan as a part of the Chairman Kim Yu. A. and members of council of Akuyev N. I., Ikhsanova U. K., Mamonova V. V., Sabikenov S. N., Temirbulatov S. G., Shopin V. D., with participation: the representative of the subject of the address - the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan N. A. Nazarbayev - the senior expert of department of questions of the legislation and judicial system of Presidential Administration Tukeev A. Zh., Minister of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan Kolpakov K. A., the criminal procedure legislation specialist, associate professor KAZGNA of Al-Farabi of Ereshev E. E. having considered in open session based on the subitem 4) of Item 1 of article 72 of the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the subitem 1) of Item 3 of Article 17 of the Presidential decree of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the valid constitutional law, "About the Constitutional Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan" the address of the President of the Republic of N. A. Nazarbaeva about official interpretation of separate regulations of the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan, ESTABLISHED:

In the Constitutional Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan the address of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan N. A. Nazarbayev about official interpretation of separate regulations of the Constitution of the Republic, with the following list of the questions offered the Constitutional Council for interpretation arrived on February 10, 1997:

1. According to Item 1 of article 4 of the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan the Supreme Court has the right to issue the normative resolutions relating to the law in force in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Proceeding from it whether the Supreme Court can make explanations of separate provisions of the Constitution concerning court practice?

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info