RESOLUTION OF THE SUPREME ECONOMIC COURT OF UKRAINE

of January 10, 2007 No. 14/202

About collection of penalties

(determination of Trial chamber on economic cases of the Supreme Court of Ukraine of 15.03.2007 it is refused to open production on review)

The Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine as a part of board of judges:

The god V.S. - the chairman,

Kostenko T. F., Korobenko G. P.

having considered the writ of appeal of JSC Yenakiieve Steel Works on the resolution of 16.10.2006. The Donetsk Economic Court of Appeal in the matter of economic court of Donetsk region in the claim of General Freyt Kargo LLC to JSC Yenakiieve Steel Works about collection of penalties in the amount of 40000 UAH,

representatives took part in judicial session:

claimant: Legostayeva M. I. (Dov. of 09.01.07 N 02),

defendant: Tominsk N.M. (Dov. of 29.12.06 N73/5/51),

ESTABLISHED:

Of 21.08.06 of economic court of Donetsk region the claim is satisfied with the decision partially. Penalties in the amount of 1000 UAH, 4 UAH of the state fee, 2, of 95 UAH of expenses on information technical supply of legal procedure are levied from JSC Enakiivsky Steel Works for benefit of General Freyt Kargo LLC. Claims regarding collection of penalties in the amount of 39 000 UAH it is refused. Of 16.10.06 of the Donetsk Economic Court of Appeal the decision stated above is cancelled by the resolution partially. The claim is satisfied in full.

Without agreeing with the resolution of the Donetsk Economic Court of Appeal, JSC Yenakiieve Steel Works appealed to the Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine with the writ of appeal and asks it to cancel, considering violation of regulations of substantive and procedural law by courts, and also incorrect assessment of the facts of the case, decisions of local economic court on this case to leave without changes.

Board of judges, in view of borders of reconsideration of the case in cassation instance, having analyzed based on the actual facts of the case application of regulations of substantive and procedural law in case of acceptance of the disputed court resolution, finds necessary to refuse satisfaction of the writ of appeal.

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info