RESOLUTION OF THE SUPREME ECONOMIC COURT OF UKRAINE

of January 11, 2007 No. 34/54pd

About recognition invalid economic obligation

(determination of Trial chamber on economic cases of the Supreme Court of Ukraine of 29.03.2007 it is refused to open production on review)

The Supreme Economic Court of Ukraine as a part of board of judges:

chairman: Greyts K. V.,

judges: Bakulina S. V., Glaus O. I.

having considered in proceeding in open court materials of the writ of appeal of Briket Open joint stock company on the resolution of 23.11.2006 of the Donetsk Economic Court of Appeal in the matter of N34/54pd of economic court of Donetsk region in the claim of the prosecutor of the Petrovsky district of Donetsk for the benefit of the state on behalf of the State tax authorities in the Petrovsky district of Donetsk to

1. JSC Briket;

2. To Lyukros private enterprise

about recognition invalid the economic obligation which arose and is executed based on the contract between defendants for the amount 14260, of 20 UAH.

representatives took part in judicial session:

from the claimant: Vindilovich T. G. (the power of attorney of 09.01.2007 N153/10/10-013)

from the defendant-1: Пласконь A.YU. (the power of attorney of 21.11.2006 N11/624)

from the defendant-2: were not

ESTABLISHED:

In March, 2006 the prosecutor of the Petrovsky district of Donetsk appealed to Economic court of Donetsk region with the action for declaration for the benefit of the state on behalf of the State tax authorities in the Petrovsky district of Donetsk to defendants of JSC Briket and software of Lyukros" about recognition invalid the economic obligation made on purpose which contradicts interests of the state and society which arose and is executed based on the agreement, and also collection with JSC Briket in the income of the state received under the controversial agreement and collection with "software of Lyukros" for benefit of Briket LLC of money in the amount of 14260, of 60 UAH.

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info