DETERMINATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

of May 12, 2005 N244-O

According to the claim of citizens Vortex Lyubov Aleksandrovna, Kareva Ekaterina Ivanovna and Maslova Valentina Nikolaevna to violation of their constitutional rights Item of 1 part one of Article 134, articles 220 and 253 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation

Constitutional court of the Russian Federation as a part of the Chairman V. D. Zorkin, judges N. S. Bondar, G. A. Gadzhiyev, Yu. M. Danilov, L. M. Zharkova, G. A. Zhilin, S. M. Kazantsev, M. I. Kleandrov, A. L. Kononov, L. O. Krasavchikova, S. P. Mavrin, N. V. Melnikov, Yu. D. Rudkin, N. V. Seleznyov, A.YA. Plums, O. S. Hokhryakova, B. S. Ebzeev, V. G. Yaroslavtsev,

having heard the conclusion of the judge N. S. Bondar who was carrying out preliminary studying of the claim of citizens L. A. Vikhrova, E. I. Kareva and V. N. Maslova based on article 41 of the Federal constitutional Law "About the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation" in plenary meeting established:

1. Proceeedings according to the petition from citizens of L. A. Vikhrova, E. I. Kareva, V. N. Maslova and according to the statement of the prosecutor of St. Petersburg for contest of separate provisions of the order of the mayor of St. Petersburg of November 29, 1993 N 958-p "About procedure for transfer to citizens to property or the life inherited tenancy of earlier provided parcels of land" based on Item of 1 part one of Article 134 and Article 220 GPK of the Russian Federation were stopped by determination of the St. Petersburg city court of March 14, 2003 because after the appeal of interested persons to court the disputed act is declared invalid by the order of the Governor of St. Petersburg of December 31, 2002 N 2732 RA "About approval of the Regulations on order of interaction of executive bodies of the government of St. Petersburg and the organizations in case of document creation for transfer into the ownership of citizens of the parcels of land which are in their use"; besides, the court noted that the made complaints are subject to consideration in other judicial process.

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info