DETERMINATION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF UKRAINE

of October 4, 2007 No. 54-v/2007

About refusal in opening of the constitutional proceeedings according to the constitutional address of the citizen Nesterenko Mikhail Nikolaevich on official interpretation of provisions of article 16 of the Law of Ukraine "About property", Articles 21, 22, 23, 24, Article parts two 28, article 44 of the Code about scrap and family of Ukraine

Case No. 2-39/2007

Constitutional court of Ukraine as a part of judges of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine:

Strizhak Andrey Andreevich - the chairman, the judge-speaker,

Brintsev Vasily Dmitriyevich,

Golovin Anatoly Sergeyevich,

Dzhunya Vyacheslav Vasilyevich,

Didkovsky Anatoly Aleksandrovich,

Kamp Vladimir Mikhaylovich,

Markush Maria Andreevna,

Machuzhak Yaroslava Vasilyevna,

Stetsyuk Pyotr Bogdanovich,

Tkachuk Pavel Nikolaevich,

Shishkin Victor Ivanovich,

N697-XII considered question of opening of the constitutional proceeedings according to the constitutional address of the citizen Nesterenko M. M. about official interpretation of provisions of article 16 of the Law of Ukraine "About property" of February 7, 1991 (In? домост? Verkhovno ї For the sake of USSR, 1991, N 20, the Art. 249), Articles 21, 22, 23, 24, Article parts two 28, article 44 of the Code about scrap and family of Ukraine of June 20, 1969.

Having heard the judge-speaker Strizhak A. A. and having considered case papers, the Constitutional Court of Ukraine established:

1. The person of law on the constitutional address is the citizen Nesterenko M. M. - appealed to the Constitutional Court of Ukraine with the petition to give official interpretation of provisions of article 16 of the Law of Ukraine "About property" (further - the Law), Articles 21, of 22, of 23, of 24, to Article part two 28, of article 44 of the Code about scrap and family of Ukraine (further - the Code) by determination of procedure by spouses of the right to joint property.

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info