DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF UKRAINE

of July 2, 2002 No. 13-rp/2002

On case on constitutional the appeal of Styrene Concern open joint stock company of rather official interpretation of provision of paragraph one of Item of 1 part one of Article 12 of the Economic Procedure Code of Ukraine (case on contest of acts in economic court)

Case No. 1-8/2002

NAME OF UKRAINE

Constitutional court of Ukraine as a part of judges of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine:

Victor Egorovich's buffoons - the chairman,

Voznyuk Vladimir Denisovich,

Ivashchenko Vladimir Ivanovich,

Kozyubra Nikolay Ivanovich,

Kostitsky Mikhail Vasilyevich - the judge-speaker,

Malinnikova Lyudmila Fiodorovna,

Mironenko Alexander Nikolaevich,

Nemchenko Vasily Ivanovich,

Rozenko Vitaly Ivanovich,

Savenko Nikolay Dmitriyevich,

Selivon Nikolay Fedosovich,

Silent Vladimir Pavlovich,

Chubar Lyudmila Panteleevna,

Shapoval Vladimir Nikolaevich,

considered case of rather official interpretation of provision of paragraph one of Item of 1 part one of Article 12 of the Economic Procedure Code of Ukraine at plenary meeting.

Reason for consideration of the case according to Articles 42, 43 Laws of Ukraine "About the Constitutional Court of Ukraine" became the appeal of Styrene Concern open joint stock company (further - Styrene Concern Ltd).

The basis for consideration of the case according to article 94 of the Law of Ukraine "About the Constitutional Court of Ukraine" is availability of ambiguous application of provision of paragraph one of Item of 1 part one of Article 12 of the Economic Procedure Code of Ukraine economic courts of Ukraine that as considers Styrene Concern Ltd, led to violation of its constitutional rights.

Having heard Kostitsky M. V. judge-speaker and having researched case papers, the Constitutional Court of Ukraine established:

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info