RESOLUTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

of October 9, 2007 No. 23

About control of constitutionality of provisions of Item 8 of the Art. III of the Order of the Government No. 1306 of December 12, 2005 "About approval of changes and additions which are made to some orders of the Government" (1)

Name of the Republic of Moldova

Constitutional court in structure:

To Dumitr PULBERE - the chairman, the judge-speaker

Alina YANUCHENKO is judge-speaker

Victor PUSKAS is judge

Elena SAFALERU is judge

Valeria SHTERBETS is judge

Ion VASILATI is judge

with the assistance of Victoria Botnaryuk - the secretary of meeting, Nicolae Eshana - the permanent representative of the Government in the Constitutional court, the deputy minister of justice, being guided by Art. 135 of the h. (1) item and) Constitutions, Art. 4 of the h. (1) item and) Law on the Constitutional court, Art. 4 of the h. (1) the item and) the Code of the constitutional jurisdiction, considered in open plenary meeting case on control of constitutionality of the Order of the Government N1306 of December 12, 2005 "About approval of changes and additions which are made to some orders of the Government".

The address of the parliamentary lawyer Ivan to Cook provided on April 20, 2007 according to Art. 24 and Art. 25 of the Law on the Constitutional court, Art. 38 and Art. 39 of the Code of the constitutional jurisdiction formed the basis for consideration of the case.

The address was accepted determination of the Constitutional court of May 21, 2007 to consideration on the merits.

During preliminary consideration of the address the Constitutional court had the points of view of Parliament, the President of the Republic of Moldova, the Government, Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Economy and Trade, Ministry of social protection, family and the child, the Prosecutor General's Office, Confederation of labor unions of the Republic of Moldova, Confederation of free labor unions "Solidaritate" of the Republic of Moldova.

Having considered case papers, having heard the message of judges-speakers and arguments of participants of meeting, the Constitutional court established:

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info