RESOLUTION OF THE PLENUM OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE AZERBAIJAN REPUBLIC

of January 31, 2006

About check of compliance of court resolutions of the Constitution and to the laws of the Azerbaijan Republic according to claim N.Mamedovoy

Name of the Azerbaijan Republic

Plenum of the Constitutional Court of the Azerbaijan Republic as a part of F. Abdullaev (chairman), F. Babayeva, B. Garibov, R. Gvaladze, E.Mamedova (judge-speaker), I. Nadzhafova, S. Salmanova and A. Sultanov,

with participation of the court secretary I. Ismaylov,

applicant N. Mamedova and her representative R. Samedov,

defendant representative of the Supreme Court of the Azerbaijan Republic A. Kalbaliyev,

according to part V of article 130 of the Constitution of the Azerbaijan Republic Yaser of gyza considered in proceeding in open court according to the procedure of the constitutional legal proceedings the constitutional case on check of compliance of court resolutions of the Constitution and the laws of the Azerbaijan Republic on Mamedova Nailya's claim.

Having heard on case the report of the judge E.Mamedov, speech of representatives of the applicant and defendant in the constitutional judicial proceedings according to R. Samedova and A. Kalbaliyeva, having studied and having discussed case papers, the Plenum of the Constitutional Court of the Azerbaijan Republic established:

N. Mamedova, that she worked 26 years at garment factory from them was 23 years on room accounting, for 7 years together with family members lived with the permission of administration in one-room apartment 52, the house 141 (the hostel 1), residential array of "AV", the settlement of Eni Gyuneshli, the city of Baku, having made the claim in court, asked to cancel the joint protocol No. 2 of Baku Sewing House Public joint stock company (further - OJSC Bakinsky shveyny dom) and its Trade-union committee and the office order 44, issued to G. Rakhmanova on October 10, 2002, and also to accept it together with family members on passport accounting in the lived room.

The claim was satisfied with the decision of Nasiminsky district court of July 7, 2003.

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info