DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF UKRAINE

of April 22, 2008 No. 9-rp/2008

On case on the constitutional representation of 52 People's Deputies of Ukraine concerning compliance of the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) of number of the presidential decrees of Ukraine concerning activities of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine and 50 People's Deputies of Ukraine concerning compliance of the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) of the Presidential decree of Ukraine "About structure of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine"

Case No. 1-10/2008

NAME OF UKRAINE

Constitutional court of Ukraine consisting of judges:

Strizhak Andrey Andreevich - the chairman,

Brintsev Vasily Dmitriyevich,

Golovin Anatoly Sergeyevich,

Dzhunya Vyacheslav Vasilyevich,

Didkovsky Anatoly Aleksandrovich,

Dombrovsky Ivan Petrovich,

Kamp Vladimir Mikhaylovich,

Mikhail Ivanovich's ear,

Lilak Dmitry Dmitriyevich,

Markush Maria Andreevna,

Machuzhak Yaroslava Vasilyevna,

Ovcharenko Vyacheslav Andreevich,

Stetsyuk Pyotr Bogdanovich,

Tkachuk Pavel Nikolaevich - the speaker,

Shishkin Victor Ivanovich,

considered at plenary meeting case on the constitutional representation of 52 People's Deputies of Ukraine and 50 People's Deputies of Ukraine concerning compliance of the Constitution of Ukraine (constitutionality) of the presidential decrees of Ukra¾ni concerning activities of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine (further - Council).

Reason for consideration of the case according to Articles 39, 40 Laws of Ukraine "About the Constitutional Court of Ukraine" are the constitutional representation of 52 People's Deputies of Ukraine and 50 People's Deputies of Ukraine.

The basis for consideration of the case according to article 71 of the Law of Ukraine "About the Constitutional Court of Ukraine" is availability of dispute on constitutionality of the Presidential decrees of Ukraine specified in the constitutional representation.

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info