DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF UKRAINE

of June 3, 1999 No. 5-rp/99

On the case of the constitutional representation of the Security Service of Ukraine, State committee of oil, gas and oil-processing industry of Ukraine, the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine on official interpretation of provisions of Item 6 of article 12 of the Law of Ukraine "About social and legal protection of the military personnel and members of their families", parts four and the fifth article 22 of the Law of Ukraine "About militia" and parts six of article 22 of the Law of Ukraine "About fire safety" (case on official interpretation of the term "family member")

Case No. 1-8/99

Constitutional court of Ukraine as a part of judges of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine:

Timchenko Ivan Artemyevich - the chairman,

Voznyuk Vladimir Denisovich,

Evgrafov Pavel Borisovich,

Kozyubra Nikolay Ivanovich,

Korniyenko Nikolay Ivanovich,

Kostitsky Mikhail Vasilyevich,

Malinnikova Lyudmila Fiodorovna,

Martynenko Pyotr Fedorovich,

Mironenko Alexander Nikolaevich - the judge-speaker,

Rozenko Vitaly Ivanovich,

Savenko Nikolay Dmitriyevich,

Selivon Nikolay Fedosovich,

Victor Egorovich's buffoons,

Silent Vladimir Pavlovich,

Chubar Lyudmila Panteleevna,

Shapoval Vladimir Nikolaevich,

Yatsenko Stanislav Sergeyevich,

considered at plenary meeting case of rather official interpretation of separate provisions of Item 6 of article 12 of the Law of Ukraine "About social and legal protection of the military personnel and members of their families" of December 20, 1991 N2011-XII (with subsequent changes), parts four and the fifth article 22 of the Law of Ukraine "About militia" of December 20, 1990 N565-XII (with subsequent changes), parts six of article 22 of the Law of Ukraine "About fire safety" of December 17, 1993 N3745-XII (with subsequent changes).

The constitutional representation of the Security Service of Ukraine, State committee of oil, gas and oil-processing industry (Gosneftegazprom) of Ukraine, the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine became reason for consideration of the case according to articles 39, of 41 Law of Ukraine "About the Constitutional Court of Ukraine".

The basis for consideration of the case according to article 93 of the Law of Ukraine "About the Constitutional Court of Ukraine" is practical need for examination or explanation, official interpretation of terms: "member of the family" of the serviceman, the employee of militia, staff of the state fire protection (Item 6 of article 12 of the Law of Ukraine "About social and legal protection of the military personnel and members of their families", part four of article 22 of the Law of Ukraine "About militia", part six of article 22 of the Law of Ukraine "About fire safety"), "family member" who lives together with the employee of militia (part five of article 22 of the Law of Ukraine "About militia") "family member" who is on content of the serviceman (Item 6 of article 12 of the Law of Ukraine "About social and legal protection of the military personnel and members of their families").

Having heard the judge-speaker Mironenko O. M. and having researched case papers, the Constitutional Court of Ukraine established:

1. Persons of law on the constitutional representation - the Security Service of Ukraine, Gosneftegazprom of Ukraine, the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine - addressed with the petition to give official interpretation of separate provisions of the called laws of Ukraine connected with content of the concept "family member" of the serviceman, employee of militia, staff of the state fire protection.

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info