CONCLUSION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

of December 9, 2008 No. 2

Under the bill on change of Art. 32 of the Constitution of the Republic of Moldova

Name of the Republic of Moldova

Constitutional court in structure:

To Dumitr PULBERE - the chairman

Alina YANUCHENKO is judge

Victor PUSKAS is judge

Petra RAJLJAN - the judge-speaker

Elena SAFALERU is judge

Valeria SHTERBETS is judge

with the assistance of Victoria Botnaryuk-Trelya, the secretary of meeting, Ion Mytsu, the permanent representative of Parliament in the Constitutional court, Nicolae Eshana, the permanent representative of the Government in the Constitutional court, according to Art. 135 of the h. (1) item c), Art. 141 of the h. (1) item c) and h. (2) Constitutions, Art. 4 of the h. (1) item c) Law on the Constitutional court, Art. 4 of the h. (1) item c) and Art. 16 of the h. (1) the Code of the constitutional jurisdiction considered in open plenary meeting the appeal of the Government about making the conclusion under the bill on change of the h. (3) Art. 32 of the Constitution of the Republic of Moldova.

Determination of November 26, 2007 the Constitutional court accepted the appeal to consideration on the merits.

Having considered the address, the draft of the constitutional law and the filed materials, the conclusions of the President of the Republic of Moldova, Institute of history, the state and the right of Academy of Sciences of Moldova, having heard the message of the judge-speaker, arguments of representatives of Parliament and Government, the Constitutional court established:

On November 13, 2007 by the Resolution N1234 Government approved the bill on change of the h. (3) Art. 32 of the Constitution of the Republic of Moldova and on November 16, 2007 brought it into the Constitutional court for making the conclusion. Based on the constitutional provisions of Art. 141 of the h. (1) the item c) the Government has the right to initiate review of the Constitution.

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info