RESOLUTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

of August 3, 2010 No. 18

About interpretation of provision of Art. 80 of the h. (4) Constitutions

Name of the Republic of Moldova

Constitutional court in structure:

To Dumitr PULBERE - the chairman, the judge-speaker

Petra RAJLJAN - the judge

Elena SAFALERU is judge,

Valeria SHTERBETS is judge

the secretary of meeting - Dina Mustyatsa, with the assistance of the deputy of Parliament Ion Pleshki, the author of the address, the permanent representative of the Government in the Constitutional court, George Susarenko, the permanent representative of Parliament in the Constitutional court, Jonah Kryange, the representative of the acting president of the Republic of Moldova, Marianna Sekeryanu, being guided by Art. 135 of the h. (1) item b) Constitutions, Art. 4 of the h. (1) item b) Law on the Constitutional court, Art. 4 of the h. (1) item b) and Art. 16 of the h. (1) the Code of the constitutional jurisdiction, considered case on interpretation of provision of Art. 80 of the h in open plenary meeting. (4) Constitutions of the Republic of Moldova.

The address of the deputy of Parliament Ion Pleshki provided on July 16, 2010 according to Art. 24 and Art. 25 of the Law on the Constitutional court, Art. 38 and Art. 39 of the Code of the constitutional jurisdiction formed the basis for consideration of the case.

The address was accepted determination of the Constitutional court of July 20, 2010 to consideration on the merits and is included in the agenda.

Having considered case papers, having heard the message of the judge-speaker and arguments of the representative of the author of the address, the Constitutional court at with t and N about in and l:

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info