RESOLUTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

of April 5, 2011 No. 7

About control of constitutionality of provisions of Art. 8 of the item g), Art. 11 of the h. (4) the Law No. 269-XIII of November 9, 1994 on departure from the Republic of Moldova and entry into the Republic of Moldova, with subsequent changes and amendments, Art. 64 of the Executive code of the Republic of Moldova No. 443-XV of December 24, 2004 in edition of the Law No. 143 of July 2, 2010 on modification and amendments in the Executive code of the Republic of Moldova

Name of the Republic of Moldova

Constitutional court in structure:

To Dumitr PULBERE - the chairman

Victor PUSKAS is judge

To Pyotr RAYLYaN-judge-speaker

Elena SAFALERU-judge

Valeria SHTERBETS is judge

the secretary of meeting is Dina Mustyatse, with the assistance of the permanent representative of Parliament in the Constitutional court Victor Morgocha, the permanent representative of the Government in the Constitutional court Oleg Efrim, being guided by provisions of Art. 135 of the h. (1) item and) Constitutions, Art. 4 of the h. (1) item and) Law on the Constitutional court, Art. 4 of the h. (1) item and) and Art. 16 of the h. (1) the Code of the constitutional jurisdiction, considered case on control of constitutionality of provisions of Art. 8 of the item g in open plenary meeting), Art. 11 of the h. (4) the Law No. 269-XIII of November 9, 1994 on departure from the Republic of Moldova and entry into the Republic of Moldova, Art. 64 of the Executive code of the Republic of Moldova No. 443-XV of December 24, 2004 in edition of the Law No. 143 of July 2, 2010 on modification and amendments in the Executive code of the Republic of Moldova.

The address of the parliamentary lawyer Tudor Lazer provided on October 12, 2010 according to provisions of Art. 24 and Art. 25 of the Law on the Constitutional court, Art. 38 and Art. 39 of the Code of the constitutional jurisdiction formed the basis for consideration of the case.

The address was accepted determination of the Constitutional court of December 10, 2010 to consideration on the merits.

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info