RESOLUTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

of June 19, 2012 No. 8

About interpretation of Article 68 of the h. (1) and (2) and Article 69 of the h. (2) Constitutions (Address No. 8b/2012)

Name of the Republic of Moldova

Constitutional court in structure:

To Alexander TENASE, chairman,

Petra RAJLJAN, judge-speaker,

To Dumitr PULBERE,

Victor PUSKAS,

Elena SAFALERU,

Valeria SHTERBETS, judges,

with the assistance of the court clerk Tatyana Oborok,

in view of the address provided on April 27, 2012

having considered the specified address in open plenary meeting, considering acts and case papers,

issues the following decree:

POINTS OF ORDER

1. The address brought into the Constitutional court on April 27, 2012 based on Art. 135 of the h formed the basis for consideration of the case. (1) item b) Constitutions, Art. 25 of the h. (1) item g) Law on the Constitutional court and Art. 38 of the h. (1) item g) Code of the constitutional jurisdiction deputies of Parliament Victor of Pop and Valery Muntyanu:

- about interpretation of Article 68 of the h. (1): "In case of execution of the mandate deputies are on service of the people";

- about interpretation of Article 68 of the h. (2): "Any imperative mandate is invalid";

- about interpretation of Article 69 of the h. (2): "The mandate of the deputy stops in day of legal convocation of new structure of Parliament or in case of resignation, deprivation of the mandate, incompatibility of positions or death"

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info