RESOLUTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

of June 28, 2012 No. 9

About control of constitutionality of syntagma to "any member" from part (1) article 10 of the Law No. 950-XIII of July 19, 1996 "About disciplinary board and disciplinary responsibility of judges", with subsequent changes and amendments, in the part concerning the right of the Attorney-General, the high councilor of magistracy by right to initiate disciplinary production concerning judges (the Address No. 6a/2012)

Name of the Republic of Moldova,

Constitutional court in structure:

Valeria SHTERBETS, chairman,

Elena SAFALERU, judge-speaker,

To Dumitr PULBERE,

Victor PUSKAS,

Petra RAJLJAN, judges,

with the assistance of Corinna of Pop, court session secretary,

in view of the address provided and registered on March 26, 2012

having considered the specified address in open plenary meeting, considering acts and case papers,

issues the following decree:

POINTS OF ORDER

1. The address of deputies of Parliament Ion Butmalay and Aleksandra Chimbrichuka brought into the Constitutional court on March 26, 2012 based on Art. 135 of the h formed the basis for consideration of the case. (1) item and) Constitutions, Art. 25 of the item g) Law on the Constitutional court and Art. 38 of the h. (1) the item g) the Code of the constitutional jurisdiction, about control of constitutionality of syntagma to "any member" from the h. (1) article 10 of the Law No. 950-XIII of July 19, 1996 "About disciplinary board and disciplinary responsibility of judges", with subsequent changes and amendments, in the part concerning the right of the Attorney-General, the high councilor of magistracy by right to initiate disciplinary production concerning judges (M.O. No. 61-62/607, 1996 of; переопубликован M.O. No. 182-185/1018, 2003 of).

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info