THE JOINT ORDER OF THE DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER - THE MINISTER OF TRADE AND INTEGRATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN AND THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL ECONOMY OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN

of June 13, 2023 No. 225-HK, 13 of June, 2023 No. 110

About modification and amendments in some joint orders

WE ORDER:

1. Approve the enclosed list of some joint orders to which changes and additions are made.

2. To provide to committee of technical regulation and metrology of the Ministry of Trade and integration of the Republic of Kazakhstan in the procedure established by the legislation:

1) state registration of this joint order in the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan;

2) placement of this joint order on Internet resource of the Ministry of Trade and integration of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

3. To impose control of execution of this joint order on the supervising vice-Minister of Trade and integration of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

4. This joint order becomes effective after ten calendar days after day of its first official publication.

Minister of national economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan

__________ A. Kuantyrov

The deputy prime minister is the Minister of Trade and integration of the Republic of Kazakhstan

__________ S. Zhumangarin

It is approved Committee on legal statistics and special accounting of the Prosecutor General's Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan

Approved by the joint Order of the Deputy prime minister - the Minister of Trade and integration of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Minister of national economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan of June 13, 2023 No. 225-HK, 13 of June, 2023 No. 110

The list of some joint orders to which changes and additions are made

1. In the joint order of the acting minister on investments and development of the Republic of Kazakhstan of December 14, 2015 No. 1199 and the Minister of national economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan of December 29, 2015 No. 826 "About approval of criteria for evaluation of risk degree and checking sheets in the field of technical regulation" (it is registered in the Register of state registration of regulatory legal acts at No. 12735):

in Criteria for evaluation of risk degree for the selection of subjects (objects) of control and supervision in the field of technical regulation approved by the specified joint Order:

state Items 2 and 3 in the following edition:

"2. In these Criteria the following concepts are used:

1) point – quantitative measure of calculation of risk;

2) normalization of data – the statistical procedure providing reduction of the values measured in different scales to conditionally general scale;

3) considerable violations – the violations of requirements of the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan in the field of technical regulation creating premises on damnification of life, to health of the person, the environment, including plant and animal life and the infringing legitimate interests of physical persons and legal entities, the states;

4) insignificant violations – the violations of requirements of the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan in the field of technical regulation which are not relating to considerable and gross violations;

5) gross violations – the violations of requirements of the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan in the field of technical regulation attracting direct damnification of life, to health of the person, the environment, including plant and animal life and the infringing legitimate interests of physical persons and legal entities, the states;

6) criteria for evaluation of risk degree – set of the quantitative and qualitative indexes connected with direct activities of the subject of control and the supervision, the features of industry development and factors influencing this development, allowing to carry subjects (objects) of control to different risk degrees;

7) objective criteria for evaluation of risk degree (further - objective criteria) - the criteria for evaluation of risk degree used for selection of subjects (objects) of control and supervision depending on risk degree in certain field of activity and which are not depending directly on separate subject (object) of control and supervision;

8) subjective criteria for evaluation of risk degree (further – subjective criteria) – the criteria for evaluation of risk degree used for selection of subjects (objects) of control and supervision depending on results of activities of specific subject (object) of control and supervision;

9) system of assessment and risk management – process of acceptance of the management decisions directed to decrease in probability of approach of adverse factors by distribution of subjects (objects) of control and supervision on risk degrees for the subsequent implementation of preventive control with visit of subject (object) of control and supervision and (or) checks on compliance to qualification requirements (further – checks on compliance to requirements) for the purpose of minimum possible extent of restriction of freedom of enterprise, providing at the same time admissible risk level in the corresponding fields of activity, and also directed to change of risk level for specific subject (object) of control and supervision and (or) release of such subject (object) of control and supervision from preventive control with visit of subject (object) of control and supervision and (or) checks on compliance to requirements;

10) the checking sheet – the list of requirements imposed to activities of subjects (objects) of control and supervision which non-compliance involves threat of life and to health of the person, the environment, legitimate interests of physical persons and legal entities, the states.

11) subjects (objects) of control and supervision in the field of technical regulation - body (organizations), the representative (representatives) on issue of the certificate of origin and certificate of origin for the internal address, about determination of the status of goods of the Eurasian Economic Union or foreign goods, manufacturers of National Flag and State Emblem of the Republic of Kazakhstan, bodies for confirmation of conformity, laboratory and applicants to which action of the technical regulation, the training centers, subjects of private entrepreneurship enabling the realization, release into the stream of commerce of products conforming to the requirements established by technical regulations extends;

12) risk in the field of technical regulation - probability of damnification as a result of activities of the subject of control and supervision of life or to health of the person, legitimate interests of physical persons and legal entities, valuable interests of the state taking into account severity of its effects;

13) sample (selection) – the list of the estimated subjects (objects) carried to homogeneous group of subjects (objects) of control and supervision according to Item 2 of article 143 of the Code.

3. Criteria for evaluation of risk degree in the field of technical regulation for preventive control with visit of subject (object) of control are created by means of objective and subjective criteria which are performed step by step (the Multicriteria analysis of decisions).

state Items 10 and 11 in the following edition:

"10. For assessment of risk degree and preventive control with visit the following sources of information are used:

1) results of the previous checks and preventive control with visit of subjects (objects) of control and supervision;

2) results of preventive control without visit of subject (object) of control and supervision (the resulting documents issued following the results of preventive control without visit of subject (object) of control and supervision).

For conducting check on compliance to requirements the source of information uses results of the previous checks.

Based on the available information sources, the state control body and supervision in the field of technical regulation creates the subjective criteria which are subject to assessment.

The analysis and assessment of subjective criteria allows to concentrate conducting check on compliance to requirements and preventive control of subject (object) of control and supervision concerning subject (object) of control and supervision with the greatest potential risk.

At the same time in the analysis and assessment the data of subjective criteria which are earlier considered and used concerning specific subject (object) of control and supervision or data according to which the term of limitation period according to the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan expired are not applied.

Concerning the subjects of control and supervision which eliminated in full the issued violations following the results of the carried-out previous preventive control with visit and (or) checks on compliance to requirements their inclusion when forming schedules and lists for the next period of the state control is not allowed.

11. Subjective criteria with distribution on degree of the importance of violations in the field of technical regulation are given in appendices 1, of 2, of 3, of 4, of 5, 6 to these criteria.

Subjective criteria for evaluation of risk degree on information sources for determination of industry risks are given in appendix 7 to these criteria.";

add with Item 13-1 of the following content:

"13-1. When forming system of risks assessment with use of information systems, measure calculation of risk degree by subjective criteria, and also risk exponents, is performed according to the list of subjective criteria in form according to appendix 7 to these criteria.

Measure calculation of risk degree by subjective criteria (R) is perfromed in the automated mode by summing of exponent of risk on violations by results of the previous checks and preventive control with visit of subjects (objects) of control and supervision (SP) and exponent of risk by subjective criteria (SC), with the subsequent normalization of values from 0 to 100 points this in the range.

R pry = SP + SC, where

R pry – intermediate exponent of risk by subjective criteria,

SP – risk exponent on violations,

SC – risk exponent by subjective criteria.

Calculation is made on each subject (object) of control and supervision of homogeneous group of subjects (objects) of control and supervision of each sphere of the state control and supervision. At the same time the list of the estimated subjects (objects) of control and supervision carried to homogeneous group of subjects (objects) of control and supervision of one sphere of the state control and supervision forms sample (selection) for the subsequent normalization of data.

Measure calculation of risk degree by subjective criteria is made on scale from 0 to 100 points and performed on the following formula:

 

xi – indicator of subjective criterion,

wi – specific weight of indicator of subjective criterion,

n – quantity of indicators.

The received risk degree measure value by subjective criteria joins in measure calculation of risk degree by subjective criteria.

The values calculated by subjects (objects) by indicator are normalized in the range from 0 to 100 points. Normalization of data is performed on each sample (selection) with use of the following formula:

 

R – risk exponent (final) by subjective criteria of separate subject (object) of control and supervision,

Rmax – the greatest possible value on risk degree scale by subjective criteria on subjects (objects) entering one sample (selection) (the upper bound of scale)

Rmin – minimum possible value on risk degree scale by subjective criteria on subjects (objects) entering one sample (selection) (the lower bound of scale)

Rprom – intermediate exponent of risk by subjective criteria.";

to be reworded as follows appendix 1 to criteria for evaluation of risk degree for selection of subjects (objects) of control and supervision in the field of technical regulation, according to appendix 1 to this joint order;

to be reworded as follows appendix 2 to criteria for evaluation of risk degree for selection of subjects (objects) of control and supervision in the field of technical regulation, according to appendix 2 to this joint order;

to be reworded as follows appendix 3 to criteria for evaluation of risk degree for selection of subjects (objects) of control and supervision in the field of technical regulation, according to appendix 3 to this joint order;

to be reworded as follows appendix 4 to criteria for evaluation of risk degree for selection of subjects (objects) of control and supervision in the field of technical regulation, according to appendix 4 to this joint order;

to be reworded as follows appendix 5 to criteria for evaluation of risk degree for selection of subjects (objects) of control and supervision in the field of technical regulation, according to appendix 5 to this joint order;

to be reworded as follows appendix 6 to criteria for evaluation of risk degree for selection of subjects (objects) of control and supervision in the field of technical regulation, according to appendix 6 to this joint order;

add with appendix 7 to criteria for evaluation of risk degree for selection of subjects (objects) of control and supervision in the field of technical regulation according to appendix 7 to this joint order.

2. In the joint order of the Minister of investments and development of the Republic of Kazakhstan of July 25, 2016 No. 575 and the Minister of national economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan of July 29, 2016 No. 351 "About approval of criteria for evaluation of risk degree and checking leaf in the field of realization of jewelry and other products from precious metals and gemstones" (it is registered in the Register of state registration of regulatory legal acts for No. 14163):

in Criteria for evaluation of risk degree for selection of subjects (objects) of control in the field of realization of jewelry and other products from the precious metals and gemstones approved by the specified joint order:

state Item 2 in the following edition:

"2. In these Criteria the following concepts are used:

1) jewelry and other products from precious metals and gemstones (further – jewelry and other products) – products, except for coins from precious metals, made of gemstones, precious metals and their alloys with use of different types of art processing, with inserts from gemstones and other materials of natural or artificial origin or without them, applied as different jewelry, utilitarian household items and (or) to the cult and decorative purposes;

2) point – quantitative measure of calculation of risk;

3) normalization of data – the statistical procedure providing reduction of the values measured in different scales to conditionally general scale;

4) risk in the field of realization of jewelry and other products – probability of damnification as a result of activities of the subject of control, to legitimate interests of physical persons and legal entities, valuable interests of the state taking into account severity of its effects;

5) subjects of control in the field of realization of jewelry and other products (further - subjects of control) – the legal entities and individual entrepreneurs enabling the realization of jewelry and other products in the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan;

6) considerable violations in the field of realization of jewelry and other products – violations of requirements in the form of realization of jewelry and other products without information on labels on use of non-noble stone as inserts in jewelry and other products, lack of registration of mark in authorized organization;

7) insignificant violations in the field of realization of jewelry and other products – the violations of requirements of the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan in the field of realization of jewelry and other products which are not relating to considerable and gross violations;

8) gross violations in the field of realization of jewelry and other products – violations of requirements regarding realization of jewelry and other products without availability of assay brand, print of the mark which is put down by the subject of production of jewelry and other products, the expert opinion, act of the state control issued on each batch when importing to the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan from the countries which are not entering into the Eurasian Economic Union;

9) criteria for evaluation of risk degree – set of the quantitative and qualitative indexes connected with the direct activities of the subject of control, features of industry development and factors influencing this development, allowing to carry subjects (objects) of control to different risk degrees;

10) objective criteria for evaluation of risk degree (further – objective criteria) – the criteria for evaluation of risk degree used for selection of subjects (objects) of control depending on risk degree in certain field of activity and which are not depending directly on separate subject (object) of control;

11) subjective criteria for evaluation of risk degree (further – subjective criteria) – the criteria for evaluation of risk degree used for selection of subjects (objects) of control depending on results of activities of specific subject (object) of control;

12) system of assessment and risk management – process of acceptance of the management decisions directed to decrease in probability of approach of adverse factors by distribution of subjects (objects) of control on risk degrees for the subsequent implementation of preventive control with visit of subject (object) of control for the purpose of minimum possible extent of restriction of freedom of enterprise, providing at the same time admissible risk level in the field of realization of jewelry and other products, and also directed to change of risk level for specific subject (object) of control and (or) release of such subject (object) of control from preventive control with visit of subject (object) of control;

13) the checking sheet - the list of requirements imposed to activities of subjects (objects) of control which non-compliance involves threat of life and to health of the person, legitimate interests of physical persons and legal entities, the states;

14) sample (selection) – the list of the estimated subjects (objects) carried to homogeneous group of subjects (objects) of control according to Item 2 of article 143 of the Code.

state Items 9 and 10 in the following edition:

"9. For assessment of risk degree the following sources of information are used:

1) results of the previous unscheduled inspections and preventive control with visit of subjects (objects) of control;

2) results of preventive control without visit of subject (object) of control (the resulting documents issued following the results of preventive control without visit of subject (object) of control).

Based on the available information sources, regulatory state agencies create the subjective criteria which are subject to assessment.

The analysis and assessment of subjective criteria allows to concentrate carrying out preventive control of subject (object) control concerning subject (object) of control with the greatest potential risk.

At the same time in the analysis and assessment the data of subjective criteria which are earlier considered and used concerning specific subject (object) of control or data according to which the term of limitation period according to the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan expired are not applied.

Concerning the subjects of control which eliminated in full the issued violations following the results of the carried-out previous preventive control with visit their inclusion when forming lists for the next period of the state control is not allowed.";

10. Subjective criteria with distribution on degree of the importance of violations in the field of realization of jewelry and other products from precious metals and gemstones are given in appendices 1 to these criteria.

Subjective criteria for evaluation of risk degree on information sources for determination of industry risks are given in appendix 2 to these criteria.";

add with Item 12-1 of the following content:

"12-1. When forming system of risks assessment with use of information systems, measure calculation of risk degree by subjective criteria, and also risk exponents, is performed according to the list of subjective criteria in form according to Appendix to these criteria.

Measure calculation of risk degree by subjective criteria (R) is perfromed in the automated mode by summing of exponent of risk on violations by results of the previous checks and preventive control with visit of subjects (objects) of control (SP) and exponent of risk by subjective criteria (SC), with the subsequent normalization of values from 0 to 100 points this in the range.

Rprom = SP + SC, where

Rprom – intermediate exponent of risk by subjective criteria,

SP – risk exponent on violations,

SC – risk exponent by subjective criteria.

Calculation is made on each subject (object) of control of homogeneous group of subjects (objects) of control of each sphere of the state control. At the same time the list of the estimated subjects (objects) of control carried to homogeneous group of subjects (objects) of control of one sphere of the state control forms sample (selection) for the subsequent normalization of data.

Measure calculation of risk degree by subjective criteria is made on scale from 0 to 100 points and performed on the following formula:

 

xi – indicator of subjective criterion,

wi – specific weight of indicator of subjective criterion,

n – quantity of indicators.

The received risk degree measure value by subjective criteria joins in measure calculation of risk degree by subjective criteria.

The values calculated by subjects (objects) by indicator are normalized in the range from 0 to 100 points. Normalization of data is performed on each sample (selection) with use of the following formula:  

 

R – risk exponent (final) by subjective criteria of separate subject (object) of control,

Rmax – the greatest possible value on risk degree scale by subjective criteria on subjects (objects) entering one sample (selection) (the upper bound of scale)

Rmin – minimum possible value on risk degree scale by subjective criteria on subjects (objects) entering one sample (selection) (the lower bound of scale)

Rprom – intermediate exponent of risk by subjective criteria.";

to be reworded as follows appendix to Criteria for evaluation of risk degree for selection of subjects (objects) of control in the field of realization of jewelry and other products from precious metals and gemstones according to appendix 8 to this joint order;

add with appendix 2 to Criteria for evaluation of risk degree for selection of subjects (objects) of control in the field of realization of jewelry and other products from precious metals and gemstones according to appendix 9 to this joint order.

3. In the joint order of the Deputy prime minister - the Minister of Trade and integration of the Republic of Kazakhstan of March 14, 2022 No. 139-HK and the Minister of national economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan of March 15, 2022 No. 24 "About approval of criteria for evaluation of risk degree and checking sheets in the field of ensuring unity of measurements" (it is registered in the Register of state registration of regulatory legal acts No. 27172):

in Criteria for evaluation of risk degree for selection of subjects (objects) of control in the field of ensuring unity of the measurements approved by the specified joint Order:

state Item 2 in the following edition:

"2. In these Criteria the following concepts are used:

1) point – quantitative measure of calculation of risk;

2) normalization of data – the statistical procedure providing reduction of the values measured in different scales to conditionally general scale;

3) insignificant violations – the violations of requirements of the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan in the field of ensuring unity of measurements which are not relating to considerable and gross violations;

4) considerable violations – the violations of requirements of the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan in the field of ensuring unity of measurements creating premises on damnification of life, to health of the person and the infringing legitimate interests of physical persons and legal entities, the states;

5) gross violations – the violations of requirements of the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan in the field of ensuring unity of measurements attracting direct damnification of life, to health of the person and the infringing legitimate interests of physical persons and legal entities, the states;

6) subjects of control in the field of ensuring unity of measurements – the physical persons or legal entities performing the activities connected with ensuring unity of measurements in the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan;

7) risk in the field of ensuring unity of measurements – probability of damnification as a result of activities of the subject of control of life or to health of the person, legitimate interests of physical persons and legal entities, valuable interests of the state taking into account severity of its effects;

8) the checking sheet - the list of requirements imposed to activities of subjects (objects) of control which non-compliance involves threat of life and to health of the person, legitimate interests of physical persons and legal entities, the states;

9) criteria for evaluation of risk degree – set of the quantitative and qualitative indexes connected with the direct activities of the subject of control, features of industry development and factors influencing this development, allowing to carry subjects (objects) of control to different risk degrees;

10) objective criteria for evaluation of risk degree (further – objective criteria) – the criteria for evaluation of risk degree used for selection of subjects (objects) of control depending on risk degree in certain field of activity and which are not depending directly on separate subject (object) of control;

11) subjective criteria for evaluation of risk degree (further – subjective criteria) – the criteria for evaluation of risk degree used for selection of subjects (objects) of control depending on results of activities of specific subject (object) of control;

12) system of assessment and risk management – process of acceptance of the management decisions directed to decrease in probability of approach of adverse factors by distribution of subjects (objects) of control on risk degrees for the subsequent implementation of preventive control with visit of subject (object) of control for the purpose of minimum possible extent of restriction of freedom of enterprise, providing at the same time admissible risk level in the field of ensuring unity of measurements, and also directed to change of risk level for specific subject (object) of control and (or) release of such subject (object) of control from preventive control with visit of subject (object) of control;

13) sample (selection) – the list of the estimated subjects (objects) carried to homogeneous group of subjects (objects) of control according to Item 2 of article 143 of the Code.

state Items 9 and 10 in the following edition:

"9. For assessment of risk degree the following sources of information are used:

1) results of preventive control without visit of subject (object) of control (the resulting documents issued following the results of preventive control without visit of subject (object));

2) results of the previous checks and preventive control with visit of subjects (objects) of control.

Based on the available information sources, the state control body in the field of ensuring unity of measurements creates the subjective criteria which are subject to assessment.

The analysis and assessment of subjective criteria allows to concentrate carrying out preventive control of subject (object) of control concerning subject (object) of control with the greatest potential risk.

At the same time in the analysis and assessment the data of subjective criteria which are earlier considered and used concerning specific subject (object) of control or data according to which the term of limitation period according to the legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan expired are not applied.

Concerning the subjects of control which eliminated in full the issued violations following the results of the carried-out previous preventive control with visit their inclusion when forming lists for the next period of the state control is not allowed.";

10. Subjective criteria with distribution on degree of the importance of violations in the field of ensuring unity of measurements are given in appendices 1 to these criteria.

Subjective criteria for evaluation of risk degree on information sources for determination of industry risks are given in appendix 2 to these criteria.";

add with Item 12-1 of the following content:

"12-1. When forming system of risks assessment with use of information systems, measure calculation of risk degree by subjective criteria, and also risk exponents, is performed according to the list of subjective criteria in form according to appendix 1 to these criteria.

Measure calculation of risk degree by subjective criteria (R) is perfromed in the automated mode by summing of exponent of risk on violations by results of the previous checks and preventive control with visit of subjects (objects) of control (SP) and exponent of risk by subjective criteria (SC), with the subsequent normalization of values from 0 to 100 points this in the range.

Rprom = SP + SC, where

Rprom – intermediate exponent of risk by subjective criteria,

SP – risk exponent on violations,

SC – risk exponent by subjective criteria.

Calculation is made on each subject (object) of control of homogeneous group of subjects (objects) of control of each sphere of the state control. At the same time the list of the estimated subjects (objects) of control carried to homogeneous group of subjects (objects) of control of one sphere of the state control forms sample (selection) for the subsequent normalization of data.

Measure calculation of risk degree by subjective criteria is made on scale from 0 to 100 points and performed on the following formula:

 

xi – indicator of subjective criterion,

wi – specific weight of indicator of subjective criterion,

n – quantity of indicators.

The received risk degree measure value by subjective criteria joins in measure calculation of risk degree by subjective criteria.

The values calculated by subjects (objects) by indicator are normalized in the range from 0 to 100 points. Normalization of data is performed on each sample (selection) with use of the following formula:

 

R – risk exponent (final) by subjective criteria of separate subject (object) of control,

Rmax – the greatest possible value on risk degree scale by subjective criteria on subjects (objects) entering one sample (selection) (the upper bound of scale)

Rmin – minimum possible value on risk degree scale by subjective criteria on subjects (objects) entering one sample (selection) (the lower bound of scale)

Rprom – intermediate exponent of risk by subjective criteria.";

to be reworded as follows appendix to Criteria for evaluation of risk degree for selection of subjects (objects) of control in the field of ensuring unity of measurements according to appendix 10 to this joint order;

add with appendix 2 to Criteria for evaluation of risk degree for selection of subjects (objects) of control in the field of ensuring unity of measurements according to appendix 11 to this joint order.

Appendix 1

to the joint Order of the Deputy prime minister - the Minister of Trade and integration of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Minister of national economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan of June 13, 2023 No. 225-HK, 13 of June, 2023 No. 110

Appendix 1

to Criteria for evaluation of risk degree for selection of subjects (objects) of control and supervision in the field of technical regulation

Extents of violation of requirements to subjects (objects) of control in the field of technical regulation concerning the manufacturer of the state symbols when carrying out preventive control with visit, and unscheduled inspections

№ of payment order	Name of the requirement	Extent of violation
1.	compliance of National Flag to the national PK 988 ST standard "National Flag of the Republic of Kazakhstan. General specifications"	rough
2.	compliance of the State Emblem to the national PK 989 ST standard "State Emblem of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Specifications"	rough

 

Appendix 2

to the joint Order of the Deputy prime minister - the Minister of Trade and integration of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Minister of national economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan of June 13, 2023 No. 225-HK, 13 of June, 2023 No. 110

Appendix 2

to Criteria for evaluation of risk degree for selection of subjects (objects) of control and supervision in the field of technical regulation

Extents of violation of requirements to subjects (objects) of control in the field of technical regulation concerning the manufacturer of the state symbols when conducting checks on compliance to requirements

№ of payment order	Name of the requirement	Extent of violation
1.	availability of the license for production of National Flag and State Emblem of the Republic of Kazakhstan	rough
2.	availability of production technical base (processing equipment, measuring instruments and control, including the atlas of the flowers providing observance of engineering procedure and quality of the made state symbols)	rough
3.	availability the master of model of each made standard size of the State Emblem of the Republic of Kazakhstan with appendix of positive result of testing	rough
4.	availability of production reference sample of each made standard size of the State Emblem of the Republic of Kazakhstan with appendix of positive result of testing	rough
5.	availability of the certificate of origin of the CT-KZ form on products "National Flag of the Republic of Kazakhstan" and "the State Emblem of the Republic of Kazakhstan"	rough

 

Appendix 3

to the joint Order of the Deputy prime minister - the Minister of Trade and integration of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Minister of national economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan of June 13, 2023 No. 225-HK, 13 of June, 2023 No. 110

Appendix 3

to Criteria for evaluation of risk degree for selection of subjects (objects) of control and supervision in the field of technical regulation

Extents of violation of requirements to subjects (objects) of control in the field of technical regulation concerning training centers when carrying out preventive control with visit, and unscheduled inspections

№ of payment order	Name of the requirement	Extent of violation
1.	carrying out preparation and advanced training of experts-auditors in confirmation of conformity, determination of the country of goods' origin, the status of goods of the Eurasian Economic Union or foreign goods is performed in the form of qualification rates	considerable
2.	availability officially the published regulating, reference and educational and methodical documents included in curricula	rough
3.	availability of curricula on each qualification rate, including lecture, the practical training (if necessary) intended to obligatory assimilation of knowledge in the field of technical regulation	considerable
4.	availability of the teachers performing preparation and advanced training of listeners according to the curriculum depending on area of training	considerable
5.	notification availability training center of authorized body about the made changes, in case of change in curricula	rough
6.	notification availability training center of authorized body, in case of the termination of the activities within 10 (ten) calendar days	considerable

 

Appendix 4

to the joint Order of the Deputy prime minister - the Minister of Trade and integration of the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Minister of national economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan of June 13, 2023 No. 225-HK, 13 of June, 2023 No. 110

Appendix 4

to Criteria for evaluation of risk degree for selection of subjects (objects) of control and supervision in the field of technical regulation

Extents of violation of requirements to subjects (objects) of control in the field of technical regulation concerning the body (organization) authorized (authorized) on issue of the certificate of origin and certificate of origin for the internal address, about determination of the status of goods of the Eurasian Economic Union or foreign goods when carrying out preventive control with visit and unscheduled inspections

№ of payment order	Name of the requirement	Extent of violation
1.	availability of the conclusion about execution of the certificate of origin in any form, before execution of the certificate of origin of the CT-KZ form constituted by the authorized person	rough
2.	issue of the certificate of origin exported, re-exported from the Republic of Kazakhstan no later than 1 (one) working day, except for, when issue is performed no later than 3 (three) working days following behind day of registration	rough
3.	the issue of the certificate of origin of the CT-KZ form or the written motivated decision on refusal in its issue no later than 3 (three) working days electronically by means of information system of authorized organization by means of information system of authorized organization given the right of registration, the certificate and issue of the certificate of origin (further – authorized organization)	considerable
4.	availability of the request of physical person or legal entity for receipt of the certificate of origin exported, re-exported from the Republic of Kazakhstan about determination of the status of goods of the Eurasian Economic Union or foreign goods	rough
5.	availability of supporting documents about the manufacturer of goods (the name with indication of the republic of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and the postal address) and years of production of goods	rough
6.	availability of the copy of transport documents, in case of export of goods to the countries of state members of the Eurasian Economic Union	rough

Disclaimer! This text was translated by AI translator and is not a valid juridical document. No warranty. No claim. More info